Skip to content

Conversation

@oyi77
Copy link
Owner

@oyi77 oyi77 commented Jan 27, 2026

⚡ Bolt: Optimize update_task JSON processing

💡 What:
Eliminated a redundant jq process spawn in lib/task_manager/simple.sh's update_task function. Previously, comma-separated values (tags, depends_on) were pre-processed by a separate jq instance before being passed to the main jq update command. Now, the raw string is passed to the main jq command, which handles the splitting and trimming internally.

🎯 Why:
Process spawning is expensive in shell scripts. Each $(...) subshell and external command invocation adds overhead. In tight loops or frequent operations, this overhead accumulates.

📊 Impact:

  • Benchmarked 20 sequential update_task operations.
  • Before: 672ms
  • After: 248ms
  • Speedup: ~2.7x

🔬 Measurement:
Run benchmark.sh (created during development) or a similar loop calling update_task repeatedly.

Verified that tags and depends_on are still correctly parsed and updated.
Ran existing tests in tests/unit/test_task_manager.bats and confirmed no new regressions (existing failures are unrelated).


PR created automatically by Jules for task 16922024910218443391 started by @oyi77

Reduces `jq` process spawns in `update_task` by moving string splitting logic inside the main `jq` query.
Improvement: ~2.7x speedup (672ms -> 248ms for 20 ops).

Co-authored-by: oyi77 <14921983+oyi77@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant